Advanced Search
Display options
Filter resources
Text Availability
Article type
Publication date
Species
Language
Sex
Age
Showing 1 to 12 of 27 entries
Sorted by: Best Match Show Resources per page
Enhancing Web-based mindfulness training for mental health promotion with the health action process approach: randomized controlled trial.

Journal of medical Internet research

Mak WW, Chan AT, Cheung EY, Lin CL, Ngai KC.
PMID: 25599904
J Med Internet Res. 2015 Jan 19;17(1):e8. doi: 10.2196/jmir.3746.

BACKGROUND: With increasing evidence demonstrating the effectiveness of Web-based interventions and mindfulness-based training in improving health, delivering mindfulness training online is an attractive proposition.OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of two Internet-based interventions (basic...

Motivational interviewing added to oncology rehabilitation did not improve moderate-intensity physical activity in cancer survivors: a randomised trial.

Journal of physiotherapy

Dennett AM, Shields N, Peiris CL, Prendergast LA, O'Halloran PD, Parente P, Taylor NF.
PMID: 30217412
J Physiother. 2018 Oct;64(4):255-263. doi: 10.1016/j.jphys.2018.08.003. Epub 2018 Sep 11.

QUESTION: Does adding weekly, physiotherapist-delivered motivational interviewing to outpatient oncology rehabilitation for cancer survivors increase physical activity levels and improve physical and psychosocial outcomes that are typically impaired in this cohort?DESIGN: Randomised controlled trial with blinded outcome assessment, concealed...

Authors' reply: Letter to the Editor: Preference option randomized design (PORD) for comparative effectiveness research: Statistical power for testing comparative effect, preference effect, selection effect, intent-to-treat effect, and overall effect (SMMR, Vol. 28, Issue 2, 2019).

Statistical methods in medical research

Heo M, Meissner P, Litwin AH, McKee MD, Karasz A, Chambers EC, Yeh MC, Wylie-Rosett J.
PMID: 29633630
Stat Methods Med Res. 2019 May;28(5):1600-1602. doi: 10.1177/0962280218767707. Epub 2018 Apr 10.

No abstract available.

Rethinking the intention-to-treat principle: one size does not fit all.

Journal of clinical epidemiology

Oude Rengerink K, Mitroiu M, Teerenstra S, Pétavy F, Roes KCB.
PMID: 32380178
J Clin Epidemiol. 2020 Sep;125:198-200. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2020.04.023. Epub 2020 May 04.

No abstract available.

Intention to Treat: Necessary But Not Sufficient.

Research in gerontological nursing

Kovach CR.
PMID: 32186747
Res Gerontol Nurs. 2020 Mar 01;13(2):62-63. doi: 10.3928/19404921-20200213-01.

No abstract available.

Subjecting known facts to flawed empirical testing.

Journal of clinical epidemiology

Berger VW.
PMID: 28063917
J Clin Epidemiol. 2017 Apr;84:188. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2016.12.008. Epub 2017 Jan 04.

No abstract available.

Intention-to-treat analysis.

Journal of physiotherapy

Elkins MR, Moseley AM.
PMID: 26096012
J Physiother. 2015 Jul;61(3):165-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jphys.2015.05.013. Epub 2015 Jun 19.

No abstract available.

Avoiding biased exclusions in cluster trials.

Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica

Thornton J, Fadl HE, Walker KF, Torgerson D.
PMID: 31953858
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2020 Feb;99(2):145-146. doi: 10.1111/aogs.13776.

No abstract available.

Interval-cohort designs and bias in the estimation of per-protocol effects: a simulation study.

Trials

Young JG, Vatsa R, Murray EJ, Hernán MA.
PMID: 31488202
Trials. 2019 Sep 05;20(1):552. doi: 10.1186/s13063-019-3577-z.

BACKGROUND: Randomized trials are considered the gold standard for making inferences about the causal effects of treatments. However, when protocol deviations occur, the baseline randomization of the trial is no longer sufficient to ensure unbiased estimation of the per-protocol...

Emulating a Randomised Controlled Trial With Observational Data: An Introduction to the Target Trial Framework.

The Canadian journal of cardiology

Kutcher SA, Brophy JM, Banack HR, Kaufman JS, Samuel M.
PMID: 34090982
Can J Cardiol. 2021 Sep;37(9):1365-1377. doi: 10.1016/j.cjca.2021.05.012. Epub 2021 Jun 06.

Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) are often considered to be the highest quality of evidence owing to the absence of baseline confounding, the simplicity of analyses, and direct estimation of causal effects. However, observational studies can be designed to mimic...

Per-Protocol, Intention-to-Treat, and Complier Average Causal Effects Analyses in Randomized Controlled Trials: Linking Evidence to Practice.

The Journal of orthopaedic and sports physical therapy

Kamper SJ.
PMID: 34058836
J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2021 Jun;51(6):314-315. doi: 10.2519/jospt.2021.0701.

This article describes the differences between common analyses for randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Intention-to-treat (ITT) and per-protocol (PP) analyses are common approaches, but readers may also encounter complier average causal effects (CACE) analysis, a newer method that is gaining...

Adjusting for bias in unblinded randomized controlled trials.

Statistical methods in medical research

Schmidt AF, Groenwold R.
PMID: 27932664
Stat Methods Med Res. 2018 Aug;27(8):2413-2427. doi: 10.1177/0962280216680652. Epub 2016 Dec 29.

It may not always be possible to blind participants of a randomized controlled trial for treatment allocation. As a result, estimators of the actual treatment effect may be biased. In this paper, we will extend a novel method, originally...

Showing 1 to 12 of 27 entries