Advanced Search
Display options
Filter resources
Text Availability
Article type
Publication date
Species
Language
Sex
Age
Showing 1 to 12 of 294 entries
Sorted by: Best Match Show Resources per page
Evidence-based practice: triumph of style over substance?.

Health information and libraries journal

Booth A.
PMID: 21831224
Health Info Libr J. 2011 Sep;28(3):237-41. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-1842.2011.00949.x. Epub 2011 Jun 27.

This feature examines the success of evidence-based practice (EBP) and the associated Cochrane Collaboration. It seeks to identify critical success factors associated with the way that both initiatives have been marketed. The simplicity of the original message used by...

Cite
Booth A. Evidence-based practice: triumph of style over substance?. Health Info Libr J. 2011;28(3):237-41doi: 10.1111/j.1471-1842.2011.00949.x.
Booth, A. (2011). Evidence-based practice: triumph of style over substance?. Health information and libraries journal, 28(3), 237-41. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-1842.2011.00949.x
Booth, Andrew. "Evidence-based practice: triumph of style over substance?." Health information and libraries journal vol. 28,3 (2011): 237-41. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-1842.2011.00949.x
Booth A. Evidence-based practice: triumph of style over substance?. Health Info Libr J. 2011 Sep;28(3):237-41. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-1842.2011.00949.x. Epub 2011 Jun 27. PMID: 21831224.
Copy Download .nbib Format: NLM
Evidence from Toxicology: The Most Essential Science for Prevention.

Environmental health perspectives

Mandrioli D, Silbergeld EK.
PMID: 26091173
Environ Health Perspect. 2016 Jan;124(1):6-11. doi: 10.1289/ehp.1509880. Epub 2015 Jun 19.

BACKGROUND: The most essential goal of medicine and public health is to prevent harm (primum non nocere). This goal is only fully achieved with primary prevention, which requires us to identify and prevent harms prior to human exposure through...

Cite
Mandrioli D, Silbergeld EK. Evidence from Toxicology: The Most Essential Science for Prevention. Environ Health Perspect. 2015;124(1):6-11doi: 10.1289/ehp.1509880.
Mandrioli, D., & Silbergeld, E. K. (2016). Evidence from Toxicology: The Most Essential Science for Prevention. Environmental health perspectives, 124(1), 6-11. https://doi.org/10.1289/ehp.1509880
Mandrioli, Daniele, and Silbergeld, Ellen Kovner. "Evidence from Toxicology: The Most Essential Science for Prevention." Environmental health perspectives vol. 124,1 (2016): 6-11. doi: https://doi.org/10.1289/ehp.1509880
Mandrioli D, Silbergeld EK. Evidence from Toxicology: The Most Essential Science for Prevention. Environ Health Perspect. 2016 Jan;124(1):6-11. doi: 10.1289/ehp.1509880. Epub 2015 Jun 19. PMID: 26091173; PMCID: PMC4710610.
Copy Download .nbib Format: NLM
Standards and guidelines for observational studies: quality is in the eye of the beholder.

Journal of clinical epidemiology

Morton SC, Costlow MR, Graff JS, Dubois RW.
PMID: 26548541
J Clin Epidemiol. 2016 Mar;71:3-10. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2015.10.014. Epub 2015 Nov 05.

OBJECTIVES: Patient care decisions demand high-quality research. To assist those decisions, numerous observational studies are being performed. Are the standards and guidelines to assess observational studies consistent and actionable? What policy considerations should be considered to ensure decision makers...

Cite
Morton SC, Costlow MR, Graff JS, et al. Standards and guidelines for observational studies: quality is in the eye of the beholder. J Clin Epidemiol. 2015;71:3-10doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2015.10.014.
Morton, S. C., Costlow, M. R., Graff, J. S., & Dubois, R. W. (2016). Standards and guidelines for observational studies: quality is in the eye of the beholder. Journal of clinical epidemiology, 713-10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2015.10.014
Morton, Sally C, et al. "Standards and guidelines for observational studies: quality is in the eye of the beholder." Journal of clinical epidemiology vol. 71 (2016): 3-10. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2015.10.014
Morton SC, Costlow MR, Graff JS, Dubois RW. Standards and guidelines for observational studies: quality is in the eye of the beholder. J Clin Epidemiol. 2016 Mar;71:3-10. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2015.10.014. Epub 2015 Nov 05. PMID: 26548541.
Copy Download .nbib Format: NLM
Reconciling evidence-based medicine and precision medicine in the era of big data: challenges and opportunities.

Genome medicine

Beckmann JS, Lew D.
PMID: 27993174
Genome Med. 2016 Dec 19;8(1):134. doi: 10.1186/s13073-016-0388-7.

This era of groundbreaking scientific developments in high-resolution, high-throughput technologies is allowing the cost-effective collection and analysis of huge, disparate datasets on individual health. Proper data mining and translation of the vast datasets into clinically actionable knowledge will require...

Cite
Beckmann JS, Lew D. Reconciling evidence-based medicine and precision medicine in the era of big data: challenges and opportunities. Genome Med. 2016;8(1):134doi: 10.1186/s13073-016-0388-7.
Beckmann, J. S., & Lew, D. (2016). Reconciling evidence-based medicine and precision medicine in the era of big data: challenges and opportunities. Genome medicine, 8(1), 134. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13073-016-0388-7
Beckmann, Jacques S, and Lew, Daniel. "Reconciling evidence-based medicine and precision medicine in the era of big data: challenges and opportunities." Genome medicine vol. 8,1 (2016): 134. doi: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13073-016-0388-7
Beckmann JS, Lew D. Reconciling evidence-based medicine and precision medicine in the era of big data: challenges and opportunities. Genome Med. 2016 Dec 19;8(1):134. doi: 10.1186/s13073-016-0388-7. PMID: 27993174; PMCID: PMC5165712.
Copy Download .nbib Format: NLM
[Alternative medicines and "Evidence-Based Medicine" a possible reconciliation?].

Revue medicale de Bruxelles

Vanherweghem JL.
PMID: 26591330
Rev Med Brux. 2015 Sep;36(4):393-5.

The contrast between the efficiency of Evidence-Based Medicine (EBM), a scientific fact, and the popularity of Complementary and Alternative Medicines (CAM) is a paradox of the art of healing. EBM is based on the paradigm of positivism and materialism...

Cite
Vanherweghem JL. Pratiques alternatives et " Evidence-Based Medicine " : une réconciliation possible ? [Alternative medicines and "Evidence-Based Medicine" a possible reconciliation?]. Rev Med Brux. 2015;36(4):393-5
Vanherweghem, J. L. (2015). Pratiques alternatives et " Evidence-Based Medicine " : une réconciliation possible ? [Alternative medicines and "Evidence-Based Medicine" a possible reconciliation?]. Revue medicale de Bruxelles, 36(4), 393-5.
Vanherweghem, J-L. "Pratiques alternatives et " Evidence-Based Medicine " : une réconciliation possible ?" [Alternative medicines and "Evidence-Based Medicine" a possible reconciliation?]. Revue medicale de Bruxelles vol. 36,4 (2015): 393-5.
Vanherweghem JL. Pratiques alternatives et " Evidence-Based Medicine " : une réconciliation possible ? [Alternative medicines and "Evidence-Based Medicine" a possible reconciliation?]. Rev Med Brux. 2015 Sep;36(4):393-5. French. PMID: 26591330.
Copy Download .nbib Format: NLM
Making sense of implementation theories, models and frameworks.

Implementation science : IS

Nilsen P.
PMID: 25895742
Implement Sci. 2015 Apr 21;10:53. doi: 10.1186/s13012-015-0242-0.

BACKGROUND: Implementation science has progressed towards increased use of theoretical approaches to provide better understanding and explanation of how and why implementation succeeds or fails. The aim of this article is to propose a taxonomy that distinguishes between different...

Cite
Nilsen P. Making sense of implementation theories, models and frameworks. Implement Sci. 2015;10:53doi: 10.1186/s13012-015-0242-0.
Nilsen, P. (2015). Making sense of implementation theories, models and frameworks. Implementation science : IS, 1053. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13012-015-0242-0
Nilsen, Per. "Making sense of implementation theories, models and frameworks." Implementation science : IS vol. 10 (2015): 53. doi: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13012-015-0242-0
Nilsen P. Making sense of implementation theories, models and frameworks. Implement Sci. 2015 Apr 21;10:53. doi: 10.1186/s13012-015-0242-0. PMID: 25895742; PMCID: PMC4406164.
Copy Download .nbib Format: NLM
[About the no evidence of the "evidence". Twenty years after the start of its use].

Ginecologia y obstetricia de Mexico

Sandoval Gutiérrez JL.
PMID: 26016318
Ginecol Obstet Mex. 2015 Jan;83(1):66-7.

No abstract available.

Cite
Sandoval Gutiérrez JL. A propósito de la no evidencia de la "evidence". A veinte años del inicio de su uso. [About the no evidence of the "evidence". Twenty years after the start of its use]. Ginecol Obstet Mex. 2015;83(1):66-7
Sandoval Gutiérrez, J. L. (2015). A propósito de la no evidencia de la "evidence". A veinte años del inicio de su uso. [About the no evidence of the "evidence". Twenty years after the start of its use]. Ginecologia y obstetricia de Mexico, 83(1), 66-7.
Sandoval Gutiérrez, José Luis. "A propósito de la no evidencia de la "evidence". A veinte años del inicio de su uso." [About the no evidence of the "evidence". Twenty years after the start of its use]. Ginecologia y obstetricia de Mexico vol. 83,1 (2015): 66-7.
Sandoval Gutiérrez JL. A propósito de la no evidencia de la "evidence". A veinte años del inicio de su uso. [About the no evidence of the "evidence". Twenty years after the start of its use]. Ginecol Obstet Mex. 2015 Jan;83(1):66-7. Spanish. PMID: 26016318.
Copy Download .nbib Format: NLM
Thas nowt so blind as 'em that won't see.

Archives of disease in childhood

Phillips B.
PMID: 23757482
Arch Dis Child. 2013 Jul;98(7):558. doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2013-304248.

No abstract available.

Cite
Phillips B. Thas nowt so blind as 'em that won't see. Arch Dis Child. 2013;98(7):558doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2013-304248.
Phillips, B. (2013). Thas nowt so blind as 'em that won't see. Archives of disease in childhood, 98(7), 558. https://doi.org/10.1136/archdischild-2013-304248
Phillips, Bob. "Thas nowt so blind as 'em that won't see." Archives of disease in childhood vol. 98,7 (2013): 558. doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/archdischild-2013-304248
Phillips B. Thas nowt so blind as 'em that won't see. Arch Dis Child. 2013 Jul;98(7):558. doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2013-304248. PMID: 23757482.
Copy Download .nbib Format: NLM
Towards evidence based medicine for paediatricians.

Archives of disease in childhood

Phillips B.
PMID: 25987239
Arch Dis Child. 2015 Jun;100(6):594. doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2015-308813.

No abstract available.

Cite
Phillips B. Towards evidence based medicine for paediatricians. Arch Dis Child. 2015;100(6):594doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2015-308813.
Phillips, B. (2015). Towards evidence based medicine for paediatricians. Archives of disease in childhood, 100(6), 594. https://doi.org/10.1136/archdischild-2015-308813
Phillips, Bob. "Towards evidence based medicine for paediatricians." Archives of disease in childhood vol. 100,6 (2015): 594. doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/archdischild-2015-308813
Phillips B. Towards evidence based medicine for paediatricians. Arch Dis Child. 2015 Jun;100(6):594. doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2015-308813. PMID: 25987239.
Copy Download .nbib Format: NLM
The use of evidence in English local public health decision-making: a systematic scoping review.

Implementation science : IS

Kneale D, Rojas-García A, Raine R, Thomas J.
PMID: 28427465
Implement Sci. 2017 Apr 20;12(1):53. doi: 10.1186/s13012-017-0577-9.

BACKGROUND: Public health decision-making structures in England have transformed since the implementation of reforms in 2013, with responsibility for public health services and planning having shifted from the "health" boundary to local authority (LA; local government) control. This transformation...

Cite
Kneale D, Rojas-García A, Raine R, et al. The use of evidence in English local public health decision-making: a systematic scoping review. Implement Sci. 2017;12(1):53doi: 10.1186/s13012-017-0577-9.
Kneale, D., Rojas-García, A., Raine, R., & Thomas, J. (2017). The use of evidence in English local public health decision-making: a systematic scoping review. Implementation science : IS, 12(1), 53. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13012-017-0577-9
Kneale, Dylan, et al. "The use of evidence in English local public health decision-making: a systematic scoping review." Implementation science : IS vol. 12,1 (2017): 53. doi: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13012-017-0577-9
Kneale D, Rojas-García A, Raine R, Thomas J. The use of evidence in English local public health decision-making: a systematic scoping review. Implement Sci. 2017 Apr 20;12(1):53. doi: 10.1186/s13012-017-0577-9. PMID: 28427465; PMCID: PMC5399426.
Copy Download .nbib Format: NLM
Reviewing the literature, how systematic is systematic?.

International journal of clinical pharmacy

MacLure K, Paudyal V, Stewart D.
PMID: 27048436
Int J Clin Pharm. 2016 Jun;38(3):685-94. doi: 10.1007/s11096-016-0288-3. Epub 2016 Apr 05.

Introduction Professor Archibald Cochrane, after whom the Cochrane Collaboration is named, was influential in promoting evidence-based clinical practice. He called for "relevant, valid research" to underpin all aspects of healthcare. Systematic reviews of the literature are regarded as a...

Cite
MacLure K, Paudyal V, Stewart D. Reviewing the literature, how systematic is systematic?. Int J Clin Pharm. 2016;38(3):685-94doi: 10.1007/s11096-016-0288-3.
MacLure, K., Paudyal, V., & Stewart, D. (2016). Reviewing the literature, how systematic is systematic?. International journal of clinical pharmacy, 38(3), 685-94. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11096-016-0288-3
MacLure, Katie, et al. "Reviewing the literature, how systematic is systematic?." International journal of clinical pharmacy vol. 38,3 (2016): 685-94. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11096-016-0288-3
MacLure K, Paudyal V, Stewart D. Reviewing the literature, how systematic is systematic?. Int J Clin Pharm. 2016 Jun;38(3):685-94. doi: 10.1007/s11096-016-0288-3. Epub 2016 Apr 05. PMID: 27048436; PMCID: PMC4909788.
Copy Download .nbib Format: NLM
Using a systematic review in clinical decision making: a pilot parallel, randomized controlled trial.

Implementation science : IS

Perrier L, Persaud N, Thorpe KE, Straus SE.
PMID: 26276278
Implement Sci. 2015 Aug 15;10:118. doi: 10.1186/s13012-015-0303-4.

BACKGROUND: Evidence suggests that systematic reviews are used infrequently by physicians in clinical decision-making. One proposed solution is to create filtered resources so that information is validated and refined in order to be read quickly. Two shortened systematic review...

Cite
Perrier L, Persaud N, Thorpe KE, et al. Using a systematic review in clinical decision making: a pilot parallel, randomized controlled trial. Implement Sci. 2015;10:118doi: 10.1186/s13012-015-0303-4.
Perrier, L., Persaud, N., Thorpe, K. E., & Straus, S. E. (2015). Using a systematic review in clinical decision making: a pilot parallel, randomized controlled trial. Implementation science : IS, 10118. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13012-015-0303-4
Perrier, Laure, et al. "Using a systematic review in clinical decision making: a pilot parallel, randomized controlled trial." Implementation science : IS vol. 10 (2015): 118. doi: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13012-015-0303-4
Perrier L, Persaud N, Thorpe KE, Straus SE. Using a systematic review in clinical decision making: a pilot parallel, randomized controlled trial. Implement Sci. 2015 Aug 15;10:118. doi: 10.1186/s13012-015-0303-4. PMID: 26276278; PMCID: PMC4542122.
Copy Download .nbib Format: NLM
Showing 1 to 12 of 294 entries